|
|
Lenses for the Olympus E-System Cameras ... and Four Thirds cameras in general |
|
My other articles related to the Olympus |
|
This is an annotated list of lenses and lens accessories available for the Olympus E-Series and, in general, Four Thirds cameras. Introduction Upon introduction of the E-1 back in 2003, Olympus faced an ambitious task of coming up with not just the first digital, interchangeable-lens SLR designed from ground up as such (and not adapted from a film model), but also with a variety of lenses, designed to work well (mechanically, electronically, and optically) with the new body, and addressed at various layers of the market. Olympus is not new to lens design. The Zuiko line for their legendary OM SLR series of almost 30 years ago were top performers. The company delivered three lenses at the moment the E-1 was introduced, and more followed shortly thereafter, at a steady and consistent pace. With the introduction of the further E-Series models, aimed at enthusiast amateur market, there arose a need for less expensive lenses to fit the Four Thirds mount. Olympus addressed that with a number of "economy" lenses, starting from the 14-45 and 40-150 mm zooms. No miracles, they cannot be as good or as versatile as the more expensive Digital Zuikos, but they may be more than good enough for the intended users, comparing favorably with the "kit" lenses offered by other manufacturers. Most importantly, the price difference is reflected mostly in more modest specifications, not in significant sacrifices in performance. The original kit lenses have been later replaced with the "new", compact 14-42 mm and 40-150 mm ZD, amazingly leighweight and compact, and capable of surprisingly good results. Sigma is continuously expanding their own line of lenses in the Four Thirds standard, having started in 2005. The earlier ones were priced aggressively, with attractive specs-to-price ratios. Some of the ones that followed have more ambitious specifications. Short supply is a notorious problem here. The offer by Leica/Panasonic includes four lenses, even if not all of them are yet available as of this update (May, 2008: the 14-150 mm Vario-Elmar still seems like a waporvare). Lenses This table lists all Four Thirds lenses available now, or announced to be available soon, as well as those already discontinued. In addition to the specs, it contains links to respective manufacturers' product pages, and, if known, U.S. prices, with links to B&H or Adorama online catalogs. Note: some of these links product pages may occasionally get broken: their Web designers move the contents around, and must have never heard of URL redirection via .htaccess files. While I'm occasionally fixing those, this is not my primary goal. Tough luck. (Links last verified February 1, 2008.) |
| Brand | Designation | FL[mm] | MaxAp | MinAp | MFD[m] | EC | El/Gr | A/S | Wgt[g] | D×L[mm] | Filter | Year | Price | Rem. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympus | ZD Fisheye | 8 | 3.5 | 22 | .135 | Y | 10/6 | 0/1 | 455 | 79×78 | - | 2006 | $670 | [2] |
| Sigma | EX DG Macro | 24 | 1.8 | 22 | .18 | ? | 10/9 | 2/? | 520 | 84×88 | 77 | 2006 | $340 | [8] |
| Leica | D Summilux | 25 | 1.4 | 16 | .38 | ? | 10/9 | 1/4 | 525 | 78×75 | 62 | 2007 | $800 | [5] |
| Olympus | ZD | 25 | 2.8 | 22 | .20 | Y | 5/4 | 1/0 | 95 | 64×24 | 43 | 2008 | $250 | |
| Sigma | EX DC HSM | 30 | 1.4 | 16 | .4 | - | 7/7 | 1/2 | 410 | 78×64 | 62 | 2006 | $400 | |
| Olympus | ZD Macro | 35 | 3.5 | 22 | .15 | Y | 6/6 | 0/0 | 165 | 71×53 | 52 | 2005 | $200 | |
| Olympus | ZD Macro | 50 | 2.0 | 22 | .24 | Y | 11/10 | 0/1 | 300 | 71×62 | 52 | 2003 | $425 | [12] |
| Sigma | EX DG Macro | 105 | 2.8 | 22 | .31 | Y | 11/10 | 0/0 | 470 | 55×103 | 58 | 2006 | $400 | |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 150 | 2.0 | 22 | 1.4 | Y | 11/9 | 1/1 | 1610 | 100×150 | 82 | 2004 | $2200 | |
| Sigma | EX DG HSM APO Macro | 150 | 2.8 | 22 | .38 | Y | 16/12 | 0/2 | 920 | 80×142 | 72 | 2006 | $600 | |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 300 | 2.8 | 22 | 2.0 | Y | 13/11 | 0/3 | 3290 | 129×281 | 112 | 2004 | $5700 | [1] |
| Brand | Designation | FL[mm] | MaxAp | MinAp | MFD[m] | EC | El/Gr | A/S | Wgt[g] | D×L[mm] | Filter | Year | Price | Rem. |
| Olympus | ZD | 7-14 | 4.0 | 22 | .25 | Y | 18/12 | 2/3 | 780 | 87×120 | - | 2005 | $1520 | |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 9-18 | 4.0-5.6 | 22 | .25 | Y | 13/9 | 2/1 | 280 | 80×73 | 72 | 2008 | * | |
| Sigma | EX DC HSM | 10-20 | 4.0-5.6 | 22 | .24 | ? | 14/10 | 3/3 | 495 | 84×86 | 77 | 2008 | $500 | |
| Olympus | ZD | 11-22 | 2.8-3.5 | 22 | .28 | Y | 12/10 | 2/0 | 485 | 75×93 | 72 | 2004 | $675 | |
| Olympus | ZD ED SWD | 12-60 | 2.8-4.0 | 22 | .25 | Y | 14/10 | 3/4 | 575 | 80×99 | 72 | 2007 | $900 | [14] |
| Olympus | ZD ED SWD | 14-35 | 2.0 | 22 | .35 | Y | 18/17 | 2/3 | 915 | 86×123 | 77 | 2008 | $2300 | [11] |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 14-42 | 3.5-5.6 | 22 | .25 | Y* | 10/8 | 2/1 | 190 | 66×61 | 58 | 2006 | $250 | [6] |
| Olympus | ZD | 14-45 | 3.5-5.6 | 22 | .38 | M | 12/10 | 2/1 | 285 | 71×87 | 58 | 2004 | ($200) | |
| Leica | D Vario-Elmar | 14-50 | 3.8-5.6 | 22 | .29 | Y | 15/11 | 2/2 | 434 | 75×93 | 67 | 2007 | * | [9] |
| Leica | D Vario-Elmarit | 14-50 | 2.8-3.5 | 22 | .29 | Y | 16/12 | 2/0 | 490 | 78×103 | 72 | 2006 | $900 | [5,9] |
| Olympus | ZD | 14-54 | 2.8-3.5 | 22 | .22 | Y | 15/11 | 3/0 | 435 | 74×88 | 67 | 2003 | $430 | |
| Leica | D Vario-Elmar | 14-150 | 3.5-5.6 | 22 | .50 | ? | 15/11 | 4/1 | 520 | 79×90 | 72 | 2008 | $1100 | [5,9,10] |
| Olympus | ZD | 17.5-45 | 3.5-5.6 | 22 | .28 | Y | 7/7 | 2/0 | 210 | 71×70 | 52 | 2005 | * | [3] |
| Sigma | EX DC Macro | 18-50 | 2.8 | 22 | .20 | ? | 15/13 | 2/2 | 525 | 79×91 | 72 | 2006 | 420 | [13] |
| Sigma | DC | 18-50 | 3.5-5.6 | 22 | .25 | Y | 8/8 | 1/0 | 250 | 68×62 | 58 | 2004 | $110 | |
| Sigma | DC | 18-125 | 3.5-5.6 | 22 | .5 | Y | 15/14 | 2/1 | 385 | 70×78 | 62 | 2004 | $280 | |
| Olympus | ZD | 18-180 | 3.5-6.3 | 22 | .45 | M | 15/13 | 2/2 | 440 | 85×78 | 62 | 2006 | $400 | |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 35-100 | 2.0 | 22 | 1.4 | Y | 21/18 | 0/5 | 1650 | 97×214 | 77 | 2005 | $2200 | |
| Olympus | ZD | 40-150 | 3.5-4.5 | 22 | 1.5 | Y | 13/10 | 0/0 | 425 | 77×107 | 58 | 2004 | $230 | |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 40-150 | 4.0-5.6 | 22 | 0.9 | Y* | 12/9 | 0/1 | 220 | 66×72 | 58 | 2006 | $280 | |
| Olympus | ZD | 50-200 | 2.8-3.5 | 22 | 1.2 | Y | 16/15 | 0/3 | 920 | 87×157 | 67 | 2003 | ($830) | [4] |
| Olympus | ZD ED SWD | 50-200 | 2.8-3.5 | 22 | 1.2 | Y | 16/15 | 0/3 | 995 | 87×157 | 67 | 2008 | $1200 | [4] |
| Sigma | EX DG HSM APO | 50-500 | 4.0-6.3 | 22 | 1.0-3.0 | Y | 20/16 | ?/4 | 1830 | 95×224 | 86 | 2006 | $1000 | |
| Sigma | DC | 55-200 | 4.0-5.6 | 22 | 1.1 | Y | 12/9 | 0/0 | 310 | 72×87 | 55 | 2004 | $150 | |
| Sigma | Apo II EX DG Macro HSM | 70-200 | 2.8 | 22 | 1.0 | ? | 18/15 | 0/5 | 1385 | 87×190 | 77 | 2008 | * | |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 70-300 | 4.0-5.6 | 22 | 1.2 | M | 14/10 | 0/3 | 615 | 80×127 | 58 | 2007 | $400 | [15] |
| Olympus | ZD ED | 90-250 | 2.8 | 22 | 2.5 | Y | 17/12 | 0/3 | 3270 | 124×276 | 105 | 2005 | $5500 | |
| Sigma | DG APO | 135-400 | 4.5-5.6 | 32 | 2.0-2.2 | ? | 13/11 | 1/3 | 1280 | 84×189 | 77 | 2007 | ($590) | |
| Sigma | EX DG HSM APO | 300-800 | 5.6 | 32 | 6.0 | ? | 18/16 | 0/2 | 5915 | 157×549 | [7] | 2007 | $6500 | |
| Brand | Designation | FL[mm] | MaxAp | MinAp | MFD[m] | EC | El/Gr | A/S | Wgt[g] | D×L[mm] | Filter | Year | Price | Rem. |
|
Tab end In case some of the acronyms I'm using in table headers are not quite clear:
Usually the lens name, as quoted by the manufacturer, contains of the manufacturer's name, focal length and aperture numbers, and then anything the manufacturer wants; sometimes meaningful and sometimes not.
As marked within square brackets in the table:
Lens accessories By this I do not mean filters, hoods, or lens caps, only those affecting the lens optics and/or geometry.
Web resources Links for individual product pages at manufacturers' sites have been provided in the first column of the table above.
The Four Thirds Consortium maintains a section on lenses from Olympus, Sigma, and Leica/Panasonic. In particular, you can download from there a lens catalog brochure (PDF), although it does not seem to keep up with the actual product line. There is also a |
| This page is not sponsored by any particular manufacturer or vendor, and presents solely the views of, and information gathered by, the author. |
|
My other articles related to the Olympus |
| Posted 2004/06/26; last updated 2008/06/28 | Copyright © 2004-2008 by J. Andrzej Wrotniak |